--- title: "Algorithm Integrity: Compliance is not the end goal" description: Algorithm integrity should drive business results, not just satisfy auditors. Focus on customers and revenue over compliance and certifications. image: https://riskinsights.com.au/hubfs/GRforC-1.jpg --- [Skip to content](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/algorithm-integrity-governance-and-compliance-are-not-the-end-goals#main-content) [![Risk Insights - Logo - (RGB, Horizontal, Small)](https://riskinsights.com.au/hs-fs/hubfs/Risk%20Insights%20-%20Logo%20-%20(RGB%2c%20Horizontal%2c%20Small).png?width=200&height=40&name=Risk%20Insights%20-%20Logo%20-%20(RGB%2c%20Horizontal%2c%20Small).png)](https://riskinsights.com.au) - [Articles](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog) - [Approach](https://riskinsights.com.au/approach) Show submenu for Approach - [Commissions (Accuracy)](https://riskinsights.com.au/broker-partner-commission-accuracy-reviews) - [Claims Fraud (Fairness)](https://riskinsights.com.au/claims-fraud-fairness-reviews) - [Fees and Charges (Accuracy)](https://riskinsights.com.au/fee-and-charge-accuracy-reviews-risk-insights) - [About](https://riskinsights.com.au/about) - [Contact](https://riskinsights.com.au/contact) Open main navigation Close main navigation - [Articles](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog) - [Approach](https://riskinsights.com.au/approach) Show submenu for Approach - [Commissions (Accuracy)](https://riskinsights.com.au/broker-partner-commission-accuracy-reviews) - [Claims Fraud (Fairness)](https://riskinsights.com.au/claims-fraud-fairness-reviews) - [Fees and Charges (Accuracy)](https://riskinsights.com.au/fee-and-charge-accuracy-reviews-risk-insights) - [About](https://riskinsights.com.au/about) - [Contact](https://riskinsights.com.au/contact) --- 23 Oct 2025 # Algorithm Integrity: Compliance is not the end goal ![Picture of Yusuf Moolla](https://riskinsights.com.au/hs-fs/hubfs/Yusuf_Moolla_Headshot-transformed.png?width=50&name=Yusuf_Moolla_Headshot-transformed.png) [Yusuf Moolla](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/author/yusuf) Share: [linkedin-in icon](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/algorithm-integrity-governance-and-compliance-are-not-the-end-goals) [envelope icon](mailto:?body=https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/algorithm-integrity-governance-and-compliance-are-not-the-end-goals) **TL;DR** • Algorithm risk management should drive business results, not just satisfy auditors or tick compliance boxes. • Focus on customer outcomes and revenue/cost optimisation. • Start with your specific business context and risks, not frameworks or "best practice" certifications.   We can build beautiful compliance frameworks with comprehensive procedures. But what looks good on paper can still deliver poor results. Even with perfect documentation, our algorithms could decline good customers, approve risky ones, and frustrate others with poor experiences. The governance can seem to work perfectly, but stifle real business outcomes. And too much focus on “best practice” can distract from the real risks and opportunities. Of course compliance matters. Regulatory requirements are important. But as the minimum standard, not the goal. In simpler terms: GRC = Governance, Risk *AND* Compliance; not Governance & Risk *FOR* Compliance.   ## Frameworks, repositories and certifications We often reach for guides or frameworks like ISO standards, NIST frameworks or risk databases. It seems to be an easy option. But in reality it can be easier to start with, but harder to execute. A leading university created an AI Risk Repository with more than 1,600 risks. If we start with that many, how likely are we to finish, and what will we achieve? We could spend months categorising theoretical problems, while our competitors are solving actual business problems. Yes, these frameworks, guides and repositories can help us to cross-check, to make sure we haven't missed anything. But they limit our thinking when we don't start with our own specific contexts and risks. We can also get caught up in chasing compliance certifications. Documenting processes to impress auditors, instead of focusing our efforts on serving our customers better. Reviewing whether procedures were followed, instead of whether algorithms are delivering business outcomes.   ## The key difference Take bias in fraud detection algorithms. A compliance focus can mean basic fairness checks to satisfy audit requirements. But biased scoring could cost us a lot of money, in terms of both [wasted investigation time and missing actual fraud](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/bias-monetary-impact). So, this is a real problem, and we can pour more resources into it. Because we can achieve a measurable outcome, rather than just a regulatory sign-off or checking a box. What's really interesting is that the business-focused approach probably delivers more robust compliance than the compliance-focused approach. Because it directly addresses the underlying business problem.   ## Algorithm integrity should drive business results We could focus on whether our models meet audit requirements. Or use algorithm integrity to optimise approval rates for good customers while turning high risk customers away. Fair credit/pricing algorithms offer competitive rates to qualified customers, based on real risk factors rather than demographics. We could focus on compliance. Or use algorithm integrity to save money and improve customer experience. Better fraud detection systems catch more real fraud and flag fewer innocent customers (fewer false positives). If we get too caught up in documentation and compliance, we could miss these opportunities entirely.   ## The bottom line In banking and insurance, algorithm performance directly influences competitiveness. Superior algorithms help win the right customers and reduce costs. Instead of building "best practice" documentation to satisfy auditors and compliance teams, we can use algorithm integrity to improve business results. Are our algorithm integrity efforts making our businesses more competitive, or just keeping our auditors happy?   --- Disclaimer: The info in this article is not legal advice. It may not be relevant to your circumstances. It was written for specific contexts within banks and insurers, may not apply to other contexts, and may not be relevant to other types of organisations. ---     ## Related posts [![Article title in words as an image with Risk Insights logo](https://riskinsights.com.au/hs-fs/hubfs/CI%20EU%20Report%20on%20AI%20in%20FS.png?height=200&name=CI%20EU%20Report%20on%20AI%20in%20FS.png)](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/curated-insight-eu-parliament-report-on-ai-in-fs) ## [Curated Insight: EU Parliament report on AI in FS](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/curated-insight-eu-parliament-report-on-ai-in-fs) 11 Dec 2025 TL;DR • This featured resource is the Nov 2025 EU Parliament report on the impact of AI on FS. • It... [Read more](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/curated-insight-eu-parliament-report-on-ai-in-fs) [![Lego people of different types - Photo by Jason Leung on Unsplash](https://riskinsights.com.au/hs-fs/hubfs/Lego_people%20(Medium).jpg?height=200&name=Lego_people%20(Medium).jpg)](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/finding-sex-gender-in-data) ## [Finding Sex/Gender in FS Data](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/finding-sex-gender-in-data) 03 Jul 2025 TL;DR • Sex has eight key attributes, some direct in data, but mostly inferred. • Many attributes... [Read more](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/finding-sex-gender-in-data) [![Checking data for a review: part 1 (overview)](https://riskinsights.com.au/hs-fs/hubfs/checking-data-part-1.png?height=200&name=checking-data-part-1.png)](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/the-checks-we-run-before-using-data-for-a-review-part-1) ## [The checks we run before using data for a review](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/the-checks-we-run-before-using-data-for-a-review-part-1) 08 Oct 2026 TL;DR • Before we use data for a review, we run a set of checks on a sample, then repeat most of... [Read more](https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/the-checks-we-run-before-using-data-for-a-review-part-1) We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the Traditional Custodians of the lands on which we live and work. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and honour the rich diversity of the world's oldest living cultures. [View our LinkedIn page](https://www.linkedin.com/company/riskinsightsap) [email us](mailto:info@riskinsights.com.au) [Call us](tel:+61408946143) 2026 Risk Insights Pty. Ltd. | [Privacy](https://riskinsights.com.au/privacy-policy) | [Disclaimer](https://riskinsights.com.au/disclaimer) ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@type" : "BlogPosting", "author" : { "@type" : "Person", "name" : "Yusuf Moolla", "url" : "https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/author/yusuf" }, "dateModified" : "2026-10-07T02:14:51.182Z", "datePublished" : "2025-10-22T20:30:00.000Z", "headline" : "Algorithm Integrity: Compliance is not the end goal", "image" : [ "https://riskinsights.com.au/hubfs/GRforC-1.jpg" ], "mainEntityOfPage" : { "@id" : "https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/algorithm-integrity-governance-and-compliance-are-not-the-end-goals", "@type" : "WebPage" }, "publisher" : { "@type" : "Organization", "logo" : { "@type" : "ImageObject", "url" : "https://riskinsights.com.au/hubfs/Risk%20Insights%20-%20Logo%20-%20(RGB%2c%20Horizontal%2c%20Small).png" }, "name" : "Risk Insights Pty. Ltd." } } ```